human adamts13 full length protein (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Human Adamts13 Full Length Protein, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 38 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human adamts13 full length protein/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 38 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "GC1126A, a novel ADAMTS13 mutein, evades autoantibodies in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura"
Article Title: GC1126A, a novel ADAMTS13 mutein, evades autoantibodies in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80674-x
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of GC1126A, rh WT-ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab in mitigating platelet count reduction in the iTTP-mimic mouse model. ( a ) Study design for therapeutic efficacy comparison. ( b ) Platelet count results. ( c ) Residual activity of ADAMTS13 in the plasma of an iTTP-mimic mouse model. Values below the limit (0.03 IU/mL) are also not present on the graph. ( d ) Inhibitory antibody levels (BU levels). Values below the limit (0.42 BU/mL) are also not present on the graph. ( b )–( d ) Outliers were identified using the Grubbs’ test (α = 0.05) and excluded from each group. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of the mean ( n = 4 mice per group).
Techniques Used: Comparison, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of GC1126A, rh WT-ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab in restoring severely reduced platelet counts in the iTTP-mimic mouse model. ( a ) Study design for therapeutic efficacy comparison. ( b ) Platelet count results. Outliers were identified using the Grubbs’ test (α = 0.05) and excluded from each group. Each bar represents the mean and standard error of the mean ( n = 3–10 mice per group).
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: The process and outcomes of candidate screening and the pharmacokinetic profile of candidates. ( a ) The diagram shows the binding domains of anti-ADAMTS13 neutralizing antibodies (Nabs). ( b ) The strategy and process of candidate screening. ( c ) The specific activity of selected candidates in the media following transient expression ( n = 1 or 2). ( d ) The relative residual activity of selected candidates in the presence of 9 Nabs ( n = 1 or 2). ( e ) The plasma concentration profiles after the intravenous administration of the selected candidates or controls (MDTCS or MDTCS-Fc) at the dose level of 160 IU/kg. Each point represents the mean and standard error of the mean ( n = 4 mice per time point).
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Expressing, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Autoantibody escaping ability of GC1126A using the iTTP patient’s plasma. ( a ) Relative residual activity of ADAMTS13 and GC1126A in the presence of autoantibodies from iTTP patient’s plasma ( n = 2). Each patient’s plasma was diluted to inhibitory antibody concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 BU/ml. Each diluted plasma was mixed with the same molar concentration (3 nM) of ADAMTS13 or GC1126A. Relative activity is the ratio of activity remaining after neutralizing antibodies in the patient’s plasma to activity when each substance is free of neutralizing antibodies. ( b ) Binding level of autoantibodies from patients with iTTP to ADAMTS13 and GC1126A. Statistical significance was determined using the one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Each bar represents the mean and standard error of the mean ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Concentration Assay, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Relationship between the anti-ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer and GC1126A EC50. The distribution of the amount of GC1126A required to achieve 0.5 IU/ml activity (EC50) for different patient samples at inhibitor titers of 0.6–0.9 BU/ml ( n = 4), 1 BU/ml ( n = 23), 3 BU/ml ( n = 15), 6 BU/ml ( n = 9), and 9 BU/ml ( n = 5) (the observed data are shown with closed circles). The estimated regression line and the 95% confidence interval are depicted in solid and dotted lines, respectively. The linear regression analysis yielded the following relationship: EC50 (µg/mL) = 0.0347 + 0.0396 × anti-ADAMTS13 inhibitor titer (BU/mL) (R 2 = 0.5842).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay

